What motivates people to vote for Hillary Clinton? I think such voters are seeking one or several of the following:
1, financial advantage,
2, aggrandizement of one’s self-image (of personal character),
3, power by association to counter a sense of weakness,
4, validation by association to justify a sense of entitlement.
The Wall Street financiers and other Big Money capitalists who are funding Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and pumping money into the Clinton Family Foundation, are making the very logical choice to vote for her because she is their best hope for a continuation of the present corrupt system of payoffs to American politicians (Citizens United style “campaign financing”).
That system, of Big Business control and ownership of the U.S. Government, ensures Big Money’s freedom to continue stealing from the public by:
– manipulating the national economy (evading regulatory oversight and taxes, getting “too big to fail” public bailouts for gambling losses),
– grossly exploiting workers (domestic and foreign),
– violating Earth’s climate and environment (with extractive industries and chemical-GMO agri-monocultures),
– and subverting foreign governments and launching wars (to “open markets”).
Financial advantage is the only logically justifiable reason to vote for Hillary Clinton, and also the only essentially criminal one (“Behind every great fortune is a great crime” – Balzac). Most of Hillary’s voters do not have the financial wherewithal to justify their support with this clear-eyed logic, theirs are emotional choices, as follows.
Aggrandizement of One’s Self-Image
Many of Hillary’s voters are entranced with their self-image of rising to the occasion of helping to make a historic advance by voting for the first American woman elected to the US presidency. The bragging rights and emotional uplift to be gained from this supersedes any other consideration, Hitler-in-skirts could get elected by these people. It is useless to talk logic and facts with such cultists, theirs is an ecstatic blindness to all of Hillary’s failings and the negative potentialities if she gains power.
The more rational among this segment of Hillary’s voters can be lower-level functionaries in the Democratic Party and organizations allied with it, who seek promotion within their organizational and corporate structures. These are “company men” and “company women” who want to feel good about their subservient ambitions, timid joiners who value their acceptance by the DNC-Tammany Hall herd, and need to go along to get along and maybe get ahead.
Power by Association, to Counter a Sense of Weakness
Many women who have been wronged by faithless men feel an instinctive bond with Hillary Clinton (Bill Clinton is a masher). They want to see a reflection of themselves raised to a position of great power, and their vote for Hillary is a subconscious act of vengeance on their male persecutors.
These are votes motivated by a sense of weakness seeking power, and respect, by association. Such women are viewing the election through the lens of their own wounded emotions, and fearfulness, and this exclusive self-focus blinds them to any logical consideration of the benefits to their own children’s futures with a Bernie Sanders presidency.
Validation by Association, to Justify a Sense of Entitlement
There are many happily situated American women who are enthused to vote for Hillary Clinton because they also want a reflection of themselves raised to a position of great power. In this case the reflection is of spoiled brats with an overweening sense of entitlement. Hillary’s ascension to the presidency would give such women validation-by-association that their social and economic privileges are “deserved.”
“It’s all about me.”
The unifying principle between the four archetypes of Hillary Clinton voter described here is this: “It’s all about me.” Hillary Clinton is clearly a paragon of this principle, and it is easy to see why others who share it — whether cynically avaricious, pathetically halo-polishing, pitifully acting out, or vainly self-absorbed — would gravitate into her black hole of political careerism.
Clinton won the Black vote in the south by landslides, in some counties by over 90% — are those Black voters are entitled, seeking financial aggrandizement, craving power by association?
#3, Seeking power by association to counter a sense of weakness. Some, sadly, are doing what they are told by black authority figures they obey (listen to uncritically). #1 & #2 are done by those in party politics (elected officials), and/or in the media and related industries (e.g., “talking heads” for Hillary; people who want political access with Hillary/Big Money Dems, in hopes of getting funding/donations for their particular “non-profit” or other organization). #4 is about people with bucks, like the movie stars (who can also have #1 and #2 mixed in).